A luxury spa operating within a 1,500-year-old Byzantine cistern next to the iconic Hagia Sophia has ignited significant controversy in Istanbul. The spa, located in the basement of the Hilton hotel, has faced backlash from the public and authorities alike, leading to its recent closure by local officials.
Key Takeaways
- The spa was housed in a historic cistern, raising concerns about cultural preservation.
- The Fatih Municipality sealed the spa after it was found to operate without proper permits.
- Legal actions are ongoing to address unauthorized modifications made to the ancient structure.
Background of the Controversy
The Navitas Spa Sarnıç, which advertised a unique blend of ancient architecture and modern luxury, offered various treatments including massages and aromatherapy. However, the spa’s operations were met with strong opposition from the community and cultural preservation advocates.
In 2023, the Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism filed a lawsuit against the spa following numerous complaints regarding its impact on the historical site. The Fatih Municipality’s investigation revealed that the spa had made significant alterations to the cistern without the necessary approvals, including:
- A glass addition to the entrance
- A jacuzzi-style pool measuring 120 centimeters deep
- Multiple massage rooms, saunas, and hammams constructed within the ancient structure
Legal Actions and Cultural Heritage Protection
The cistern, classified as a Group I cultural asset, is part of the Sultanahmet Square Urban Archaeological Site, which is subject to strict conservation regulations. In 2022, the Conservation Areas Board mandated the removal of illegal modifications within six months. However, the spa continued its operations, prompting a criminal complaint in December 2023.
The Ministry of Culture and Tourism has since rejected the spa’s request for tax exemption due to ongoing violations. The complex ownership structure of the cistern, which includes nearly 60 co-owners, has further complicated restoration efforts. The Regional Directorate of Institutions, owning only a fraction of the cistern, has stated it cannot initiate restoration without unanimous consent from all stakeholders.
Community Reactions
The incident has sparked widespread debate about the balance between tourism, business interests, and the preservation of historic landmarks in Istanbul. Many locals and cultural advocates have expressed their outrage over the commercial exploitation of such a significant historical site. The Fatih Municipality has been tasked with providing a detailed report on the irregularities and submitting approved restoration plans to ensure the integrity of the cistern is maintained.
Conclusion
As legal proceedings continue, the future of the luxury spa remains uncertain. The case highlights the ongoing struggle to protect Istanbul’s rich cultural heritage from unauthorized commercial ventures. The local government and cultural authorities are under pressure to enforce regulations that safeguard the city’s historical sites while navigating the complexities of tourism and business interests.